| |
|
| addressing the challenge of climate
change |
|
Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|
|
|
Climate change presents Sasol, and arguably the global community as a
whole, with our most significant sustainability challenge. It is critical
not only for our existing facilities, but also for our growth ambitions
as we seek to roll-out our technologies globally.
We believe that meeting the growing global demand for energy will accelerate
greenhouse gas emissions unless technological solutions and management interventions
are developed and implemented. We acknowledge that a comprehensive approach to
greenhouse gas management needs to be adopted for all our activities.
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
| We will strive to reduce our greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in many ways, including by: |
|
| • |
measuring and reporting on our global GHG emissions; |
| • |
in the short term, introducing and optimising management interventions, including setting
corporate targets for reducing GHG emissions intensity; |
| • |
acquiring, developing and implementing energy and carbon efficient technologies and
processes; |
| • |
actively pursuing GHG mitigation-related financial instruments such as the Clean
Development Mechanism as a means to accelerate a reduction in our global GHG footprint; |
| • |
assessing the future implications of greenhouse gases in new and existing ventures; |
| • |
developing and maintaining intelligence and partnerships in the alternative energy, carbon
sequestration and other applicable emerging fields; |
| • |
investigating opportunities to capture and store carbon dioxide as part of our planned
international expansion of our coal-to-liquids (CTL) interests; |
| • |
working with governments and regulatory authorities in the countries where we operate
to achieve optimum GHG management solutions; and |
| • |
applying sustainable development principles to all business activities. |
|
|
| |
|
| While climate change presents a significant challenge, Sasol has an impressive record in
developing and implementing innovative solutions. We believe that a combination of these
alternatives and the correct investment decisions, taken together with stakeholders, will
contribute measurably to ensure a sustainable future. As part of our commitment to identifying
solutions in partnership with our stakeholders, this year we conducted a high-level dialogue
with some leading South African climate change practitioners, with the aim of reflecting
critically on the nature of these challenges for our current activities. A summary of the outcome
of this dialogue is presented elsewhere in this report. |
|
| |
|
| Reducing our greenhouse gas emissions |
|
| Our total global emission of methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2), direct and indirect,
decreased from 73 million tonnes (Mt) in 2006 to 71 Mt in 2007. A breakdown of our emissions
by major facility is provided in the accompanying graph. Our inventory of GHG emissions has
been developed using the international recognised reporting protocol of the World Business
Council for Sustainable Development and the World Resources Institute based on the
management control approach. Our direct and indirect CO2 emissions have been externally
verified on the basis as outlined in the KPMG statement. |
|
| |
|
 |
|
| |
|
The Sasol group executive committee has recently approved our revised greenhouse gas policy
statement and an environmental roadmap for the next 15 years, with a particular focus on
greenhouse gases and water. We have committed to a group target of achieving at least a 10%
reduction in GHG emissions per ton of product, on the 2005 baseline, by July 2015. We have
prepared a detailed roadmap with milestone targets to guide us towards achieving this goal.
A greenhouse gas management forum has been established to give guidance and direction to
the group on these issues.
We are committed to identifying and implementing energy efficiency initiatives that will provide
important benefits that are not only related to CO2 reduction. We have committed R4 billion to
improve our energy efficiency over the following years, and we anticipate that this will result in
a reduction of more than 6 million tonnes of CO2 from the baseline.
Recognising the higher GHG intensity of our coal-to-liquids facilities, we are investigating
opportunities to capture and store CO2 as part of our planned international expansion of our
CTL interests. We have recently commissioned a study for a comprehensive life cycle assessment
of CTL operations, accommodating CTL designs in countries such as India, China and the USA.
These models will use data from feasibility studies as they become available.
In July 2007, we registered a Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) project for the reduction of
nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from our Sasol Nitro operations at Sasolburg and Secunda. It is
anticipated that the project - the first of its kind in the world using secondary catalyst - will
reduce N2O emissions by an amount equivalent to about one million tonnes of carbon dioxide
per annum. One ton of N2O has the greenhouse impact equivalent to 310 tonnes of carbon
dioxide. This technology converts N2O into nitrogen and oxygen.
Several new CDM projects are in the pipeline. Our Italian and German chemical operations have
participated in the European Emission Trading Scheme in terms of EU legislation.
This year we participated in the global Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) and we are committed to
continued transparency on our performance. Internationally, we participated in a working group
of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that publishes a report on carbon dioxide
capture and storage.
We also participate as a South African representative on the international Carbon Sequestration
Leadership Forum (CSLF). At the meetings and workshops of the annual forum, there is a
valuable sharing of pilot projects amongst experts from more than 20 countries. This improves
our understanding of carbon dioxide capture and storage opportunities. We are also assisting
South Africa in the evaluation of, and participation in the Methane to Markets initiative.
|
|
| |
|
Internationally, security of oil supply and cost concerns have led to
a renewed worldwide interest in coal as an alternative source of oil-derived
products. With declining oil production and reserves in some regions, alternative
sources will clearly be required for the liquid fuels and chemicals derived
from oil. Coal conversion technologies, particularly CTL synthesis using
the world’s vast coal resources, are increasingly seen as a proven
and viable means of filling that requirement. With our established world-scale
CTL operation and over 50 years’ experience in this field, Sasol
is well-placed to take a lead in developing CTL as one of the alternatives
to traditional crude-derived routes.
Studies have shown that while our gas-to-liquids (GTL) processes, on a life cycle
assessment basis, typically have a neutral to slightly positive performance on
GHG emissions relative to a crude oil refining system, our CTL conversion technology
has a higher GHG intensity and thus warrants particular attention.
The CO2 emissions from such a CTL facility consist of process and utility emissions,
with an approximately equal split between the two sources of emissions. Process
CO2 occurs as part of the coal conversion process and is readily available in
pure form. This is different to a coal-fired power station where all the carbon
is emitted in a diluted stream. Due to the concentrated nature of the process
CO2 and the relatively large quantity from a commercial size CTL facility, this
CO2 stream lends itself better to carbon capture and storage (CCS). The principle
behind this is that CO2 is stored by compressing the gas to a liquid form and
injecting it into deep geological formations, such as saline aquifers, unmineable
coal seams for methane production, or into older oil fields to enhance oil recovery.
In some of these cases, the revenue generated by enhanced oil recovery can offset
the cost of CCS.
CCS also has the added benefit that it enables the extraction of energy from
coal, while also substantially lowering the carbon footprint. This leads to the “decarbonising” of
coal. The science underpinning CCS is sound and is based on decades of experience
in the closely allied fields of petroleum exploration and gas storage in geological
structures. The remaining (and manageable) challenge is to refine the skills
to model, monitor and verify the behaviour of largescale CO2 capture and storage
throughout the CCS process. Many organisations and companies have world-class
capacity and experience in this area, and Sasol is committed to leverage this
existing knowledge base. The Dakota Gasification Company, based in the USA, using
a similar coal gasification technology as used by Sasol today, captures and sells
CO2 by pipeline for use in enhanced oil recovery across the border in Canada.
According to the International Energy Agency (http://www.iea.org), the current
capture cost of CCS for power plants ranges from US$30/ton to US$90/ton CO2,
depending on the separation technology employed and the CO2 purity in the fuel
gas. A significant advantage that a CTL facility has over that of a conventional
coal-fired power plant is that half of the CO2 emitted from the CTL process is
available in concentrated form. Since mainly compression of the pure process
CO2 stream is required to transport the CO2 offsite for geological storage, a
CTL facility can capture this process CO2 at a fraction of the cost to that of
a conventional coal-fired power plant.
|
|
| |
|
| Sasol is currently investigating the potential for geological storage in many of the areas
where new CTL ventures are being considered, such as the USA, India and China. We are also
investigating the sequestering of CO2 from our local operations in South Africa. The early
deployment of CCS for any of Sasol's CTL projects will depend on the following pre-conditions: |
|
| • |
A good CO2 source and sink match - a low-cost large-capacity secure geological storage
site in close proximity to a proposed (or existing) CTL facility. |
| • |
A low-capture cost for the CO2 - this is currently achievable for the process CO2 that is
available at high concentrations. |
| • |
Some form of offset to the combined cost of capture and storage - such as enhanced oil
recovery, or some form of policy-based CO2 mitigation incentive. In some countries the
use of the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) can assist to finance CCS, if approved. |
|
|
| |
|
Sasol believes that CCS should not be the only means of CO2 mitigation for its current and
future operations. Instead, we believe it is an essential part of the portfolio of solutions and
initiatives necessary to achieve sustainable development objectives, while reducing the levels
of CO2 released to the atmosphere. Other solutions being studied by Sasol include increasing
process efficiency and promoting renewable fuel sources such as biomass gasification.
We have reviewed Sasol's environmental roadmap with a particular focus on updating our
GHG reduction activities. As part of this commitment, the potential role of renewable energy
is again under investigation. We are conducting initial studies on biodiesel and biomass
gasification to better understand the economic, social and environmental opportunities and
challenges associated with increased use of renewable energy in a carbon constrained future.
We recognise the need for government involvement and appropriate policy instruments to
encourage greater use of renewables in South Africa and we are contributing to this effort
through our participation in the development of a national renewables policy. |
|
| |
|
| "Our future economic
performance is partly
dependent on CTL production
capacity growth. We really
have to spend more time,
money and energy in
developing cost-effective
solutions to reduce the
environmental impact of
CTL plants. This is a tough
business challenge, but also a
huge business opportunity." |
|
| Sasol employee |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |